Ai-chan answered. Do not forget what you yourself said.
Well yes, you made a point and all, but it still has nothing to do with the matter at hand, no? Isn't the lil issue here: 'what the community will do WITH the added feature', not really any of the specifics about the feature itself? Where is the relevancy, WHERE?!?!
Ai-chan didn't reply to the rest of your reply because it was clear that you were triggered or angry. Ai-chan has no interest in entertaining that
Woah.. Apparently, I was angry? Damn, I didn't even notice ?? I mean, I could understand if someone said I sound "Condescending" but angry or triggered? Off the rip?
?Damn, that's actually new. My humor has never been so far off.. But I'll have you know I actually have
alot of fun in a good ol' argument or debate. I'm very passionate ?
Ai-chan respected your opinion and tried to move on. It's your turn to respect our opinion instead of deriding our opinion as stupid or funny.
Damn, that's crazy.. Because.. Forgive me if i'm wrong, but didn't I specifically state that I don't think your suspicions are unfounded? You responded to my suggestion and brought forth your own little 'conjecture', which was that "The inclusion of paragraph comments, would hurt some authors." I AGREED.
However, I also disagreed on some points, that is what it means to have a debate ? You were clearly blowing things out of proportion, so I had to come in and clear the air a Lil bit, It was mad unsanitized.
?? I'd say sorry for the joke but it wouldn't be sincere
?
Oh ye, btw, I don't think immediately shutting me down and disregarding my statement because you somehow came to the conclusion that I'm "Angry" is very 'respecting' of my opinion, so a bit hypocritical, but hey, that's just me.
?
Hell, at least I had the decency to respond and acknowledge your statement and points despite my apparent '
derision' and
ridicule.. You can't even extend that same favor? As da homie Yoda might've said.. Very rude you are.
??
the way your following comments sounded....hmm idk...I'll let you decide. Ofc, as someone once said, it is hard to read the tone of online messages so there's that...
Yeah, despite what it looks like, most of the things I said, especially with the teary puppy eyes were genuine
? The undertone of mockery was definitely intentional tho. Debates are absolutely ZERO fun if there's no barbs thrown in there. ? Still, usually people can atleast SOMEWHAT catch the amusement I -not so subtly- tried to shove in there.
However, the other side do mention some valid points.
They do have some extremely valid points I didn't think about, (besides the obvious one about people trying to correct them or discourage them) the 'pacing' comment brought up by
[SIZE=4]Snusmumriken[/SIZE] and [SIZE=4]DarkeReises[/SIZE] was delicious. Kinda embarrassed to not have thought of that considering I have to actively stop myself from checking comments because I don't wanna ruin my own immersion
??