Since I've been tagged, I'll just say that the synopsis is indeed very inconsistent and unnecessary with questionable implications due to the 18+ disclaimer. But I wouldn't go as far to outright call it child abuse material since nothing I've seen up to chapter 4 depicts anything of that nature.
That being said, posting a picture of the island enjoyer even as a joke is pretty distasteful.
If the story took place in a high school or other school like maybe college, a setting appropriate for 18+ year olds, it'd be just a regular, strange story at best in my opinion.
I'm sorry. I admit my fault on the insensitivity and would like to apologize.
I was trying to bring the mood up on the heavy topics we are discussing.
I'll be more careful next time.
Island enjoyer? What's that?
I feel so confused today. Am I really that old?
He is a well know pedophile that has appeared many years on American social media.
I have learned to be cautious whenever the topic of children and R18 come out. Therefore, I also am extremely defensive when these two items appear together.
No matter the circumstances.
"That indicates pedophilia" Is a WILD jump to make from that disclaimer. There is no outright fanservice or sex scenes, there is descriptions of child mutilation, death and a few sexual humor moments. Again, since you really seem to have difficulty understanding a key point, there is no erotica/R18 material within the novel itself. That is just a conclusion you made because you only skimmed through the sypnosis rather than the novel itself.
Yeah Epstein Diddy Blud jokes are really a thing you should keep for xitter and tiktok
I respect people who have a stronger/strange moral compass, but just know I do not respect fictional characters as if they were a real person.
1. I am but an opinion on the internet, my reaction may be similar to what other might go through when reading the novel synopsis and warnings.
2. I am only writing what I immediately feel when I see on the first page. I am also not willing to read anything written once the (potential) of pedophilia is given on the front page.
3. I will never scold a fellow author, but I only give caution or reasoning. I put the shadow-ban and children-r18 facts together and came to the conclusion something was amiss.
Since you are awaiting clarification on the de-listing and have emphasized to us the readers on your new information.
I would prefer you a-wait any new info from moderators and indicate the closure of the thread.
Anynya, you made it all sound quite dramatic, so what exactly the issue here, I wonder?
