Search results

I could tell you, but then I'd have to make you disappear. :sweating_profusely:

expand on existing lore is my bet.

That's because once you sign the contract you can't disparage them at all or they will sue you into oblivion. :sweating_profusely: As far as the picture, I think it sets but won't show up immediately at first. It's been a while since I messed with it honestly, but I do remember there being...

.

Also full disclosure, WN contracts are practically legalized slavery. I would never sign one about any web fiction or work you care about on their site. IF you're going to monetize it, you should just come up with a concept specifically for that site / app. and never use the same pen name that...

1) login 2) click the icon of your avatar in top right. 3) click the name URL link in the drop down display. (on hover it says 'My profile') 4) Click edit profile on the page that shows up. 5) Edit profile.

Stay true to what you want, unless you have a reason not to. For example, if you're writing to get readers--then make content they like. Otherwise, write what you originally planned. You'll be happier if you're achieving your goals.

Some men just want to watch the world burn. And I'm one of them. Carry on. :blob_popcorn:

A truck-kun class adventurer whose only task is to go around taking out other adventurers. [its truck-kun] Gods and goddesses with betting pools on which world / species / adventurer will die first. [shitty goddess trope] Gods and Goddesses who never check their "celestial inbox" so when...

I don't anymore. Well.. sort of but not really. Lately I've just been getting a lot of random offers from various sources. Before I was doing work on Fiverr, but I closed that account down--huge scam. They take 20% from both the provider and the purchaser. Also their clientele tends to be the...

Fantasy allows for anything you want. You could create enhanced reflexes that slow the perception to a crawl, allowing them to dodge bullets as long as their focus isn't broken. Or shields that will negate death.

I think most are inherently "good". But there are many proven factors. The biggest is environment. Humans learn to be cruel or selfish mostly due to how they grow up in their younger years. Some are more selfish by nature and need to learn the necessities of coexistence as well. If good and...

Right.. and I just suggested something that I feel is viable. My suggestion isn't placed to enforce "objective" reviews. Its recommended to inform people whether a review is more opinionated or objective in nature. For someone who's arguing so vehemently against this--it seems you really didn't...

Also for a point of clarity, this is pretty much all I suggested. Image 1 - How reviews would look to readers. Clicking thumbs up would mark their choice on how they felt the review was either more opinionated or more objective in nature. Based on the # of reviews, and the ratings, the...

What your suggesting is actually more work for moderators. I'm not calling into question whether moderators will remove erroneous reviews. What I'm suggesting allows you to forgo that altogether and instead implement a system that clearly shows whether a reader / reviewer is biased so that...

Essentially, what I proposed was adding accountability features to the review system. As the review system stands now, basically people can say whatever they want -- even if it's untrue. There's many obvious flaws with that, for example if someone just hates you they can downrate you, lie and...

I did ask for changes to the system that would make the owner's job easier. So..what's the excuse that people have now?

Surprised this didn't get flamed and down voted. Seems like virtually any ask for accountability on the reporting / reviewing process on SH does. :sweating_profusely: