I appreciate the feedback, but my review of your review is that you are giving me advice on how to write a normal story, an immersive cinematic first-person present tense action fiction. Which mine is not. My story is an epistolary psychological horror. The tag for unreliable narrator is there because the story precisely is vague, messy and intentionally distant emotionally.
It feels like you are critiquing me for not writing a different genre. Which is fine, just not relevant to me personally.
I use the diary syndrone or the 'distance' for pure psychological stakes.
You know she will survive, but why? What is she actually doing?
What is she hiding? Is she even human? Why does her perception feel.. off? Warped?
My goal isn't immersive, sensory, “be in the scene” type of survival horror. It's reading the diary of someone who's not okay. The distance and flatness is intentional, the meta-commentary is a mask. If I followed your advice entirely, I would definitely lose the clinical, detached creepy factor I'm going for, as I take mild inspiration from the journal sections in American Psycho, The Yellow Wallpaper, House of Leaves and of course the king of them all: Dracula.
Anyway, before I create more of a wall of text, thank you for taking the time to read!
Feel free to revisit.