Jemini
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
- Messages
- 2,037
- Points
- 153
Hmmm... I see.
Apparently, I just thought of it at first through the same way that Brandon Sanderson did on his prologue in Mistborn. He started with a character that has just unimportant pagetime by explaining what the fk is going on with the Inquisitors at that time iirc... and then presenting a scenario by looking down on their slaves at their utmost misery.
It was kind of reason why I hook with it, not because of the character, but the setting he just presents.
And that's what I tried to do the same in my book as well, but it just turned out to be... a poorly-done slam onto the reader's face.
Inquisitors = scary / negatively charged emotionality = tangible.
Suffering of slaves = pitable + culturally charged as something we as a people have come to largely reject.
These are both something that is strong and able to hook the reader, even if they are a little harder to identify with. Brandon Sanderson decided to abandon the simple and identifiable aspect of creating a hook, but that was because he understood the base concept of a hook to start with and knew the rule well enough to find something powerful enough to get the same draw anyway, even while otherwise breaking the letter of the rule.
That's a very advanced writing technique that should only be attempted by masters of their craft. For now, you should probably stick to the base letter of the rule. Make your hook simple, tangible, and identifiable, and try to create an emotional attachment of some sort.