How would you confuse an all knowing being?

Gray_Mann

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2024
Messages
519
Points
108
Are we talking truly all-knowing? Or that Gideon Offnir type of all-knowing....
 

Prince_Azmiran_Myrian

🐉Inquisitor Dragon Appraising Hoard🐉
Joined
Aug 23, 2022
Messages
2,838
Points
153
The problem is, they are not obligated to answer.

No, the solution is simple. Punch them in the face. Or hit them in the head with a baseball bat. They know everything, but they are not immune to being concussed, a symptom of which is confusion.
But they know what you're gonna do and have prepared for it.
 

Tempokai

The Overworked One
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Messages
1,397
Points
153
Once, in a place where mountains dreamed and rivers whispered forgotten names, there lay a marble temple at the edge of existence—built not to worship the divine, but to test it. The High Priest of the Temple of Inquiry, a man so devoutly curious he had replaced his heart with a question mark, prepared for the greatest rite of all: the Game of Knowing.

It was a rare ritual, called only when the cosmos hiccupped and spat out a soul so swollen with hubris it could make even a god sweat. The rules, ancient and etched into the altar with the blood of reason, were deceptively simple:

1. The opponent knows everything.

2. They cannot be tricked, tampered with, or lied to.

3. They must respond to all queries.

4. And they must do so with truth as gifted directly from the mouth of the Divine.

To win, you need to confuse the God. Simple.

The priest, robed in logic and arrogance, summoned God—not the bearded, benevolent cliché, but the true form: a shifting storm of meaning, truth compressed into form, language before it had vowels. The skies split like overripe fruit. The stars blinked like they’d just remembered something embarrassing. The air vibrated with syllables from no known tongue, yet everyone present understood, in that warm, horrifying way one understands a dream where the floor is missing.

And from the crowd stepped the challenger.

Not a sorcerer. Not a philosopher. Not a madman, although he wore all three like cloaks when the wind changed. No, this was The Rhetorician, whose voice had once made a sphinx cry and whose metaphors were legally declared weapons in five dimensions. He bowed, mockingly, arms wide as if welcoming a punch to the face.

God did not bow. God shimmered in inevitability.

The priest spoke, voice ceremonial, but brittle with anticipation. “We call upon the Divine to play the Game of Knowing. The Rhetorician will ask. You, O Boundless One, will answer.”

God responded, not with words, but with understanding. Everyone felt it. Everyone wanted to throw up a little.

And the Game began.

The Rhetorician stepped forward, smiling like a man who had just found a loophole in his execution contract.

“Oh Great Knowing, let’s start soft. Answer me this: If all that can be known is already within you, and you knew I would ask this question, why are you only answering it now?”

God’s reply came, not in speech, but in the air itself bending toward comprehension. “Because your asking completes the question. Until it is spoken, it is not real in the realm of inquiry.”

The Rhetorician tilted his head. “But you knew I’d ask. So you knew it was real before I made it so. So I was irrelevant to the question. So why answer me at all?”

God pulsed, annoyed in a way only omniscience can be—deeply, logically, righteously annoyed. “Because knowledge includes all paths, including the ones where silence is still response.”

The crowd shifted, uncertain if that counted as divine sass.

The Rhetorician circled like a philosopher around fresh prey. “So, you admit that you must act out the answers you already know, even when doing so changes nothing?”

God: “To know all is to fulfill all.”

He laughed. Actually laughed. “Oh, delightful. So we’ve established your knowledge is performative. Let’s lean in.”

He reached into a satchel and pulled out a single piece of parchment. Blank, save for a single question written in ink that shimmered wrong: What happens when you respond to a question that was only asked to trap your response in paradox?

And God… paused.

Only for the length of a blink of a concept, sure. But in that pause the clouds forgot their names, and time skipped like a scratched record. The temple cracked in sympathy.

God replied. It wasn’t words—it was a cascade. Knowledge flooding out like someone had kicked a hole in eternity. An explanation came, complete, recursive, contradictory, elegant, broken, shimmering. It said everything and nothing, tied meaning into a Mobius strip of logic so pure it choked on itself.

The priest wept. Not from awe, but because he had, for a moment, understood—and that moment had cost him his sanity. He now believed he was a kettle.

The Rhetorician, smiling so hard his teeth filed themselves into points, bowed again. “Beautiful. You answered. Truthful. But to everyone here, it was indistinguishable from nonsense. Not because you failed, but because we are too limited. And you knew that. And you answered anyway.”

God glimmered in frustration, which is to say, He shimmered no differently at all. But the Rhetorician understood.

“You are trapped,” he continued, circling again, like the idea of a smirk made flesh. “Not by me, no—I am a worm in the dirt. But by your own perfection. You must answer. You must be complete. You must play the game, even when the game is a farce, because the moment you don’t, you are no longer the All-Knowing.”

He leaned in close. “That’s the joke, you see. I don’t need to win. I just need to ask questions that, in being answered, subtract meaning instead of adding it. You cannot lose, but you can only win into silence.”

God spoke again. This time, in words. Terrible, radiant words. “Then speak your final question, if you believe confusion is victory.”

The Rhetorician closed his eyes, smiled a final time, and asked:
“If I have already proven that any answer you give to this question will appear as confusion to me, and you know this, and I know that you know, and I still ask it, and you still answer it—who, then, is confused?”

And that’s when it happened.

Not a bang. Not a scream. But a stillness so absolute it shattered sound. The wind forgot to move. Time held its breath like a child waiting to be caught. The answer came—but it came as absence.

God had answered. Of course He had. But no one, not even the Rhetorician, could remember what He’d said. They just knew it had been said, and now it was gone.

God stood silent. Still radiant. Still omniscient. But… quiet.

Because there, in the echo of the final question, lay a truth even the divine could not undo:

To play the Game of Knowing is to descend into meaninglessness by design.

The Rhetorician bowed. “Thank you for your service.”

And he walked away, leaving God—not defeated, not diminished, but performatively paralyzed. For in that moment, He was trapped in a perfect loop: knowing, responding, being misinterpreted, knowing He’d be misinterpreted, and still knowing He must go on.

A perfect record skipping in eternity.

Rhetorician won the game, at the cost of the meaning of the game. The game was preordained to be lost, and God knew it. And yet, he played it anyway.
 

GlassRose

Kaleidoscope of Harmonious Contradiction
Joined
Apr 20, 2021
Messages
405
Points
133
But they know what you're gonna do and have prepared for it.
Not necessarily. Just because they know it will happen doesn't mean they will choose to prepare for it, they could let it happen. Why? Well perhaps because it knows that if it doesn't let it happen, then something worse will happen. It is only one being, with a limited scope in what it can do. You can't beat it if you start playing at the same time, but what if you got the opportunity to prep beforehand? It doesn't matter if it know every possible outcome to every choice it makes, if every outcome ends in a loss.

Or it might let it happen out of apathy towards the result.

It's not perfect, even if you rope other people in to help you, if you don't get a head start then the being could get others to help it resist whatever you do, in a much more perfect fashion and then you're screwed, but it is a more realistic method of accomplishing the task than merely talking to it or being strange at it.
 

ElijahRyne

A Hermit that’s NOT that Lazy, currentlycomplainen
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Messages
1,837
Points
153
Partially motivated by a game I wanted to make, but in general,
You are up against someone whose power is that they know everything, no drawbacks. No highjacking that. God themselves will give that person pure untampered information.

So how do you confuse such a person?
Make a perpetual infinite random information generator.
 

RiceballWasTaken

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2024
Messages
120
Points
63
Partially motivated by a game I wanted to make, but in general,
You are up against someone whose power is that they know everything, no drawbacks. No highjacking that. God themselves will give that person pure untampered information.

So how do you confuse such a person?
Show them Josiah
 
Top