ForestDweller
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2020
- Messages
- 838
- Points
- 133
So on the one hand I don't think anybody would have a problem with this? Virginity is a made up nonsense concept, sex work is work, go read The Ethical Slut by Easton & Hardy;
On the other hand the way you've asked this question and the language you used tell me you're the last person that should write this. The mere fact you're inherently framing the lady's past as a sex worker as "sad, broken, makes her a villain" (your words, not mine) is blaring like, all of the alarms that you've never even talked to a single sex worker in your entire life, which makes you severely underequipped to write about one.
So: reach out to a sex worker and ask them for some of their time as a sensitivity reader. And, if my feeling is right, prepare to have your mind be blown that sex does not, in fact, "damage" women. They're not goods you know, they're people.
EDIT: that's, of course, assuming you meant "whore her body around" as in was a sex worker. If you meant whore as in was a promiscuous lady, like... slut shaming in 2020, really?
Yeah, my story is a harem wish-fulfillment kind of story so I wouldn't bother trying to appease feminists. I mean, the girl would feel heavily guilty for that and would deem herself too impure for the MC, and even she becomes one of his wives, she would still carry a little of that guilt, manifesting as jealousy towards the other wives who keep their purity for the MC.
Now that's definitely triggering.
By casually imply, I mean more "mention it but don't put up a giant bulletin board of expositional info stating what should be extremely obvious if you know how to read and understand context." You know, like a girl casually complaining about something that one of her ex's did and not bring any more attention to it than that. That one thing alone tells readers that the girl used to be in a relationship. At that point, it's safe to assume that she's potentially done things with her ex. Now, you could have the protagonist be the type of guy who then asks his girlfriend about a bunch of details, wanting to know what she's done with him, and all that... but I'd rather not write a MC who I dislike for being one of those creepy guys obsessed with virginity who needs to know every detail of his girlfriend's prior relationships = P. The casual implication is much healthier for the relationship, less exposition-y than giving the reader every detail, and realistic for most relationships.
In my story, the girl would tell everything to the MC straight-up.