First-time author seeking feedback on sentimental fantasy (orphan MC)

AllenL

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2025
Messages
6
Points
3
Hello!
I’m a new writer from Southeast Asia, and I’ve finally decided to start my own fantasy series. It follows an orphan who slowly discovers a vast, mythical world through small, slice‑of‑life adventures.

My writing style is influenced by Japanese light novels and some classic fantasy, so it’s a bit more immersive and slower‑paced than what you might usually find here.

I plan to upload one chapter per week as I work toward my writing dream. I hope you’ll enjoy the story and maybe join me on this journey!



here's the page: https://www.scribblehub.com/series/2052682/dawn-of-the-ancient-great-beast/
 
Last edited:

AllenL

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2025
Messages
6
Points
3
Hey everyone! Just wanted to bump this with an update.

For anyone who's interested in non-system progression fantasy:

My story follows orphans who have to figure out magic/skills through observation and trial-and-error rather than stat screens or level-ups.
The story is now at Interlude 1 (~19k words). We've wrapped up the first major arc (a moss-hopper outbreak that tests the orphans' survival skills), and we're heading into Arc 2.
I'm still trying to balance:
  • Multiple POVs
  • Slice-of-life pacing with action beats
  • Character development vs. plot progression
Still looking for honest feedback - I'd love to know if it's working or if it feels too slow. I'm writing 10+ chapters ahead, so I can adjust based on reader response.
 

K_Nishi

Member
Joined
May 30, 2025
Messages
66
Points
18
The slice-of-life opening in Chapter 1 works really well.
You can clearly feel the warmth of the found-family dynamic, and it does a great job grounding the reader in the characters’ everyday lives.

That said, there’s a noticeable gap between the introduction so far and what the synopsis promises—particularly the monster outbreak, the kidnapping, and the ancient blessing. Because of that, some readers may feel a mismatch in expectations early on.

As a possible solution, you might consider either:
① adding a single line to the beginning of the synopsis that references the orphanage, the cold, or the characters’ daily life, or
② inserting a brief hint of unease or foreshadowing (just one line) in Chapter 1 to suggest the coming danger.

Either approach would help align reader expectations without disrupting the strengths of the current opening.
 

AllenL

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2025
Messages
6
Points
3
The slice-of-life opening in Chapter 1 works really well.
You can clearly feel the warmth of the found-family dynamic, and it does a great job grounding the reader in the characters’ everyday lives.

That said, there’s a noticeable gap between the introduction so far and what the synopsis promises—particularly the monster outbreak, the kidnapping, and the ancient blessing. Because of that, some readers may feel a mismatch in expectations early on.

As a possible solution, you might consider either:
① adding a single line to the beginning of the synopsis that references the orphanage, the cold, or the characters’ daily life, or
② inserting a brief hint of unease or foreshadowing (just one line) in Chapter 1 to suggest the coming danger.

Either approach would help align reader expectations without disrupting the strengths of the current opening.
Appreciate the feedback! :blob_aww: I went for a slower start on purpose. I wanted readers to feel the orphanage bonds before throwing them into danger. You’re right that the synopsis jumps ahead of what’s posted, so I’ll tweak it to better match the early chapters while still hinting at the bigger scope. Glad you pointed that out—it helps me keep the pacing and expectations aligned.
 

Eldoria

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 14, 2025
Messages
1,744
Points
113
Still looking for honest feedback - I'd love to know if it's working or if it feels too slow. I'm writing 10+ chapters ahead, so I can adjust based on reader response.
Well, I've read 2 chapters as a casual reader who happened to pass by and read them once to gauge the immersion.

My general impression is, even though you use the first POV, your narrative is still light-telling to convey the plot, characters, and worldbuilding through the MC's internal thoughts/perceptions.

This doesn't really disrupt the pacing, but it does make the immersion flat. The reader is positioned as an observer observing the MC from the outside, instead of making the reader feel like he or she is living as the MC in his or her world.

This is quite unfortunate, because the first POV should have deep immersion where MC = I am = reader.

Here are some technical things you can consider in conveying your narrative:

(1) As explained before, your narrative still tends to be light-telling. You position the MC as someone who 'tells' what he sees and thinks.

For example, your MC at the beginning of chapter 1 immediately explains the characters (his or her roommates). Who are they to MC? At chapter 2, MC even explicitly explains the characters' personality, such as saying that person is kind. This is light exposition.

However, this practice is not good. Because the lack of immersion makes the reader feel 'guided' so that the reader is very likely to forget them. The solution?

Reduce the telling. Don't let the MC guide the reader! Make your MC the reader's lens through which to breathe, perceive, feel, act, and live in the world.

Instead of describing how kind character X is, you can have the MC observe character X helping an orphan with a simple act (like giving bread) while interacting with character X through action and dialogue.

This way, the reader can conclude for themselves that character X is kind without needing the narrator's (MC) explanation.

(2) Your early chapters are very character-heavy. I noticed at least 5-8 characters appearing almost simultaneously with a short narrative spacing. This is not good. These characters are too dense. As a result, readers tend to forget about them. The solution?

Don't place character introductions too close together. Gradually introduce the characters by interacting organically with the MC through action and dialogue. Make them come to life, rather than just a list of names in your chapters.

(3) Character identities are vague. Back to points 1 and 2... because you are using the MC as an exposition tool, the characters are only identified and introduced through names and brief descriptions. This makes it difficult for the reader to visualize your characters.

You need to be more patient in building your characters. Don't just mention their name, narrate how the character's identity includes their name, unique physical characteristics, nickname, appearance, personality, role and relationship with the MC.

Give a clear visualization of your character. And don't make the reader guess what your character looks like?

(4) You haven't done this... but if you apply suggestion no. 3, you have the potential to describe the character excessively and statically. This is not good, because descriptive narratives slow down the pacing. The solution?

Introduce your character through cinematic action narratives. The description (of the character) must follow the action. For more details, please read this thread.

(5) Your narrative lacks spatial clues, which makes the image of the space blurry.

For example, when the MC eats at the dining table, the narrative lacks clues about the location and position of the MC and other characters in the dining room. Another example, in chapter 2, you lack clues about the location of the other characters walking with the MC on the village road. As a result, the visualization becomes blurry. The solution, provide clear spatial clues.

The narrative "I sat in dining room" is abstract.

But the narrative "I sat behind the dining table. Lys and Lie sat to my right and left. My black eyes reflected the shadow of the nun standing holding a pan."

It's a concrete narrative. Readers can imagine this scene in 3D in their perception.

(6) Additional: Re-learn the principle of show it, don't tell it. Enrich your narrative with sensory responses not only visual and audio but also taste, touch, smell, physiological and inner state.

Minimize mentioning raw emotions such as I'm anxious, I'm happy, etc.

Show emotions through body language, action, dialogue, atmosphere and tension.

Make the reader immersed and feel the world through the MC. Thus, your narrative will be more alive, more immersive.

I think that's enough feedback from me. Hopefully this feedback helps you or maybe not.

Regards.

Critical Note:
My assessment may be biased. I only provide feedback as an honest reader about my reading experience.
 
Last edited:

AllenL

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2025
Messages
6
Points
3
Well, I've read 2 chapters as a casual reader who happened to pass by and read them once to gauge the immersion.

My general impression is, even though you use the first POV, your narrative is still light-telling to convey the plot, characters, and worldbuilding through the MC's internal thoughts/perceptions.

This doesn't really disrupt the pacing, but it does make the immersion flat. The reader is positioned as an observer observing the MC from the outside, instead of making the reader feel like he or she is living as the MC in his or her world.

This is quite unfortunate, because the first POV should have deep immersion where MC = I am = reader.

Here are some technical things you can consider in conveying your narrative:

(1) As explained before, your narrative still tends to be light-telling. You position the MC as someone who 'tells' what he sees and thinks.

For example, your MC at the beginning of chapter 1 immediately explains the characters (his or her roommates). Who are they to MC? At chapter 2, MC even explicitly explains the characters' personality, such as saying that person is kind. This is light exposition.

However, this practice is not good. Because the lack of immersion makes the reader feel 'guided' so that the reader is very likely to forget them. The solution?

Reduce the telling. Don't let the MC guide the reader! Make your MC the reader's lens through which to breathe, perceive, feel, act, and live in the world.

Instead of describing how kind character X is, you can have the MC observe character X helping an orphan with a simple act (like giving bread) while interacting with character X through action and dialogue.

This way, the reader can conclude for themselves that character X is kind without needing the narrator's (MC) explanation.

(2) Your early chapters are very character-heavy. I noticed at least 5-8 characters appearing almost simultaneously with a short narrative spacing. This is not good. These characters are too dense. As a result, readers tend to forget about them. The solution?

Don't place character introductions too close together. Gradually introduce the characters by interacting organically with the MC through action and dialogue. Make them come to life, rather than just a list of names in your chapters.

(3) Character identities are vague. Back to points 1 and 2... because you are using the MC as an exposition tool, the characters are only identified and introduced through names and brief descriptions. This makes it difficult for the reader to visualize your characters.

You need to be more patient in building your characters. Don't just mention their name, narrate how the character's identity includes their name, unique physical characteristics, nickname, appearance, personality, role and relationship with the MC.

Give a clear visualization of your character. And don't make the reader guess what your character looks like?

(4) You haven't done this... but if you apply suggestion no. 3, you have the potential to describe the character excessively and statically. This is not good, because descriptive narratives slow down the pacing. The solution?

Introduce your character through cinematic action narratives. The description (of the character) must follow the action. For more details, please read this thread.

(5) Your narrative lacks spatial clues, which makes the image of the space blurry.

For example, when the MC eats at the dining table, the narrative lacks clues about the location and position of the MC and other characters in the dining room. Another example, in chapter 2, you lack clues about the location of the other characters walking with the MC on the village road. As a result, the visualization becomes blurry. The solution, provide clear spatial clues.

The narrative "I sat in dining room" is abstract.

But the narrative "I sat behind the dining table. Lys and Lie sat to my right and left. My black eyes reflected the shadow of the nun standing holding a pan."

It's a concrete narrative. Readers can imagine this scene in 3D in their perception.

(6) Additional: Re-learn the principle of show it, don't tell it. Enrich your narrative with sensory responses not only visual and audio but also taste, touch, smell, physiological and inner state.

Minimize mentioning raw emotions such as I'm anxious, I'm happy, etc.

Show emotions through body language, action, dialogue, atmosphere and tension.

Make the reader immersed and feel the world through the MC. Thus, your narrative will be more alive, more immersive.

I think that's enough feedback from me. Hopefully this feedback helps you or maybe not.

Regards.

Critical Note:
My assessment may be biased. I only provide feedback as an honest reader about my reading experience.
Thanks for your assessment, Eldoria! The first arc of the story was also a growth arc for me as a writer. "Show, not tell" sometimes clashed with "deduce and summarize in first-person POV" as I tried to balance immersion and pacing. I’m aware that character appearances are a bit vague, but I also had to balance maintaining tension without diluting it, which sometimes meant less narration on characters.
I really appreciate your feedback. As a casual reader myself, I might not have been able to evaluate a story like this—maybe because I’m not a native English speaker (no offense). Now that I’m writing my own story, I hope to adopt some of these styles and improve in future chapters.
 

Eldoria

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 14, 2025
Messages
1,744
Points
113
Thanks for your assessment, Eldoria! The first arc of the story was also a growth arc for me as a writer. "Show, not tell" sometimes clashed with "deduce and summarize in first-person POV" as I tried to balance immersion and pacing. I’m aware that character appearances are a bit vague, but I also had to balance maintaining tension without diluting it, which sometimes meant less narration on characters.
I really appreciate your feedback. As a casual reader myself, I might not have been able to evaluate a story like this—maybe because I’m not a native English speaker (no offense). Now that I’m writing my own story, I hope to adopt some of these styles and improve in future chapters.
Well, showing isn't about providing a detailed story. This is a misconception. Showing is about leaving interpretation to the reader by providing narrative clues or necessary information.

The narration, "My head is throbbing, it feels like I'm being stabbed by needles..." is a concise showing to make the reader conclude that MC is experiencing dizziness or a headache.

This is more about the creative writing paradigm regarding how a narrative places the reader in the story. So, you don't need to worry about your narrative being long, rambling, and disrupting your pacing if you use showing too much.

And it's important to note, telling isn't wrong. A narrative still requires telling to summarize the flow of previous chapters, provide quick context, implement time skips, avoid scene repetition, and even provide conclusions and moral messages related to a chapter or even an arc.

In short, showing and telling, those are more like an author's journey in effectively conveying a story (storytelling) to the reader.
 
Last edited:
Top