I was reminded of this just now because I'm watching a video essay about misery memoirs and the presenter makes a good point about how individualism played a huge part in the boom of misery lit because it frames suffering (especially in the context of child abuse) as something that the individual triumphs over through their own power. People enjoyed misery memoirs because they were easy to consume: a sad, abused child rises above their painful beginnings through sheer force of will and grit, pulling themselves up by their bootstraps to overcome their trauma. There's nothing in a misery memoir to critique the systems that created that situation of abuse, so although at one point misery memoirs were a huge presence and sold everywhere, there was no subsequent movement from readers to overhaul or improve things like childcare, poverty, mental health services, foster care services, child welfare, because those things were never held up as important to the narrative.I didn't say hyper-individualism.
And what the bleep is hyper-individualism? (I refuse to use Google.)
Hyper-individualism as opposed to what? The commune will provide? The village will provide? Mommy will provide?
Seriously. I'm honestly intrigued.
Literally none of this has anything to do with why I made this thread. Go make your own thread if you want to talk about this. Or don't, I don't care. Just stop derailing my thread.One has to go back further and examine the whole arc.
There were systems and institutions. For all of that. Here in the United States, there were institutions for mental health; thousands of 501(c)(3) charities for child welfare, foster services, poverty relief, all funded by individuals and corporations through donations and endowments (Save the Children, Habitat for Humanity, the Home for Little Wanderers, and countless others); the churches with their deep pockets took a direct hand in services for orphans, providing adoption services... and on, and on. There was a time, back in the time of evil capitalism through this country's ascendency, when corporations and individuals founded charities that grew into giant institutions, when they founded schools, with capital earned and saved through individual merit, by people and organizations that wanted to give back and improve civil comity. There was a time, at the height of the United States, when John F Kennedy said, ".... ask what you will do for your country." An entire nation rose up and answered. Individual effort, initiative, and capital, for the greater good.
And then we fell.
Since then, it has all fallen apart with breathtaking rapidity. Now, socialism, the Nanny State, Hillary Clinton's "village," are all we know. We don't found charities anymore. We don't open primary schools and colleges anymore. We expect the village to do it for us. It has devolved so rapidly that two generations know nothing different. But some are old enough to remember what came before, when individuals had a personal responsibility to pull their weight for the greater good.
That's an easy one.What book(s) do you think has the worst moral or message you've ever heard?
For me, I'm gonna have to go with this one:
View attachment 48544
It's a book about a kid who gets sent to a school that teaches monster children how to blend into human society. It sounds derivative but inoffensive on the surface, but then the author really starts beating you over the head with the "don't let others people tell you how to live" message. The problem? A lot of these monster kids want to kill and eat people. So the teachers are painted as being ignorant and intolerant for wanting to teach kids not to eat people, and the kids who go along with the lessons are soulless conformists.
Raise your hand if "conformity is a worse crime than cannibalism" is a sentence you didn't think you would read today.