Jemini
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
- Messages
- 2,037
- Points
- 153
I do not know if there's already a "block" feature on the forums, but if there is then it is not in any place that's clear or obvious.
I have been dealing with long-term harrassment on the forums by a certain user, and have asked them on several occasions to leave me alone. However, they will not stop. When I attempted to report them for harrassment, I was told that everyone has the right to reply to other users, and that I'd have to just block them. I attempted to do so, but I found no function to allow me to do such a thing on the forums.
I know where the "block" function is on the novel posting end of the site, but I cannot find such a function on the forums.
If one does not exist, I would like to see it prevent another user from replying to the person's posts or @ posting at them, and also prevent the person who initiated the block from doing the same back to them so we do not accidentally respond to the person not noticing it's them in cases where they have an unassuming looking avatar and posts something such as, say, a video that jumps out far more prominently than the user's avatar. (A scenario I've been caught in fairly recently with this user.)
Making posts invisible to another user is a sticky situation here though, but if there is any of that involved in the feature, then it should not be only the blocked person being invisible to the one who blocked them. If it's going to be one-sided, then the person who initiated the block should be invisible to the person they are blocking, as to prevent scenarios where the harrasser in question is bad-mouthing their victim without the victim having knowledge of it to defend themselves.
I believe, however, the best case scenario would be a mutual two-way invisibility in which all posts of either user are hidden from the other.
Finally, and this is something of a 2nd feature request I might have mentioned elsewhere before, I think the forum and the novel site accounts should be linked. The problem here is that the "block" feature exists in a very intuitive manner on the novel site, but it either does not exist on the forum or exists with a very unintuitive presentation such as to render it effectively unusable by anyone who would actually need it.
This issue can be solved very effectively by simply linking accounts. It is also a matter where, if someone does need to block someone else, it's likely they would want them blocked on both ends of the site as the kind of person who is likely to need to be blocked is also likely the type who may stalk a person to their novel and cause trouble there as well.
EDIT: Ok, I actually finally found the "ignore" feature, as it's called, immediately after making this post.
The rest of my points still stand. But, in terms of where my head was and why I wasn't able to so easily find it attached to the profile page of the user I wanted to block, I think an improvement would be to put an "ignore user" button on all posts immediately next to the "report" item.
Now that I am ignoring the user in question, I will see how helpful the current features on the site are in regards to this.
I have been dealing with long-term harrassment on the forums by a certain user, and have asked them on several occasions to leave me alone. However, they will not stop. When I attempted to report them for harrassment, I was told that everyone has the right to reply to other users, and that I'd have to just block them. I attempted to do so, but I found no function to allow me to do such a thing on the forums.
I know where the "block" function is on the novel posting end of the site, but I cannot find such a function on the forums.
If one does not exist, I would like to see it prevent another user from replying to the person's posts or @ posting at them, and also prevent the person who initiated the block from doing the same back to them so we do not accidentally respond to the person not noticing it's them in cases where they have an unassuming looking avatar and posts something such as, say, a video that jumps out far more prominently than the user's avatar. (A scenario I've been caught in fairly recently with this user.)
Making posts invisible to another user is a sticky situation here though, but if there is any of that involved in the feature, then it should not be only the blocked person being invisible to the one who blocked them. If it's going to be one-sided, then the person who initiated the block should be invisible to the person they are blocking, as to prevent scenarios where the harrasser in question is bad-mouthing their victim without the victim having knowledge of it to defend themselves.
I believe, however, the best case scenario would be a mutual two-way invisibility in which all posts of either user are hidden from the other.
Finally, and this is something of a 2nd feature request I might have mentioned elsewhere before, I think the forum and the novel site accounts should be linked. The problem here is that the "block" feature exists in a very intuitive manner on the novel site, but it either does not exist on the forum or exists with a very unintuitive presentation such as to render it effectively unusable by anyone who would actually need it.
This issue can be solved very effectively by simply linking accounts. It is also a matter where, if someone does need to block someone else, it's likely they would want them blocked on both ends of the site as the kind of person who is likely to need to be blocked is also likely the type who may stalk a person to their novel and cause trouble there as well.
EDIT: Ok, I actually finally found the "ignore" feature, as it's called, immediately after making this post.
The rest of my points still stand. But, in terms of where my head was and why I wasn't able to so easily find it attached to the profile page of the user I wanted to block, I think an improvement would be to put an "ignore user" button on all posts immediately next to the "report" item.
Now that I am ignoring the user in question, I will see how helpful the current features on the site are in regards to this.
Last edited: