Search results

If historical fiction involves real life people, I'm going to have to say it's a fanfiction. If you think about it, the "fiction" part of fanfiction comes from the fact that you are writing fiction, not taking inspiration from a fiction. It is fan-fiction. It is fiction, made by/ derived by/...

English is my first language, and also the only one I can speak.

"Everyone freeze! This is a robbery!"

Both are harem. But I can't choose both in the poll, so I'll chose option 2 I guess.

So I've been thinking about fast food types for a conversation in my latest chapter. However, I don't really know much about the subject. So what types of fast food are there, that perhaps isn't often thought of as fast food, but definitely could be? Do Takeaways like Indian or Chinese cound as...

I prefer male protagonists, though I'll still read a lot of stories with female MCs.

Babies don't have natural strength to begin with. if super-strength is multiplicative this wouldn't be a problem until the child grows up into a teenager. I'ma go with fire.

The islands are on the backs of giant turtles. You're welcome.

I hate the concept of work.

I'd argue, yes. As other people have said, morals will be invoked whether you indend for them to be or not. Every decision your character makes and it's subsequent consequences showcase morality from your stories' point of view. Consider a bandit. Suppose this bandit attacks a civilian, kills...

This sounds oddly familiar :blob_hmm_two:

The problem you've identified doesn't really strike me as related to overthinking or overplanning. Instead, it's the concept of making new things for the sake of making new things. As for what causes "things for the sake of things" in the first place, I would expect that being more indicative of...

In ancient times, scientists chased after the illusionary philosopher's stone- a miraculous item that cures any ailment and grants immortality. Modern scientists laugh at them for confusing fiction with facts, science with magic. Yet, those same scientists make the same mistakes as their...

I need to try something: ?‍⬛ ?⬛

What apocalypse? Don't be ridiculous. There is no apocalypse. The apocalyse is a myth. It never actually happened. Huh? Books about living on the surface? Give those to me. Those are just fantasies written by people with too much time on their hands. The surface was never habitable for humans...

Borrowing from the discussion of previous thread, I'm of agreement that a character is a character if it has a voice (personality) to it. As long as a biological entity is not shown to have a personality, it's not a character. Take a pet in a fantasy world; they are developed with personality...

If yes to all three, does that make the mecha a character? I have mixed feelings about making robots/ai/mechas into characters. it can be done, but should it be done? Is it good practice?