Search results

Doesn't that depend on the medium? In a visual medium, in which there is no way of spinning a narrative between dialogue, there is no other choice but to have parts "narrated" that you can't find a place within the story for. Of course, even then you shouldn't just slap a lot of "World Building"...

13.617:6799 So about 49,9~% of total views are valid ones.

99 % of the time, rule of thumb says: If you feel the need to ask, the answer is "Yes".

It's used as the butt of every joke, because people are afraid of extending that same criticism to other religions. And I say that, though I'm an atheist and quite blasphemous by nature. Jokes aside, your post was a fun read.

WTF. But in my opinion, that's relatively close to the fact that you have to mark your content as AI generated if you so much as use a service to check your spelling and wording, if it's run by ai. Like, story is yours, written by you, edited and rounded up by you, but you get hints on how to...

Maybe he's trying to... send a message. :blob_cookie:

I don't that's actually needed? If it's not a hard focus, I don't believe anyone will care, it's not like it changes a lot - unless it does change a lot, which is when you should tag it, I guess. I believe that it depends on how much the reader has to go with the gender bender idea, I think? For...

If it's something simple, I can help you with a cover. I don't use Freeware, so I can't recommend any, except for Gimp maybe (but I don't expect you could run that on your device). But I could make one.

If they knew about you opinion, they shouldn't have reacted surprised. Mind boggling. It doesn't seem like intelligent life was around when that happened, not gonna lie. Commenting beforehand, as in testing the waters, usually gives those away that really can't take it.

Well, the patreon thing definitely sounds dickish, not gonna lie. :blob_blank: :blob_popcorn_two: Even without money involved, blocking someone goes too far. But just as valid as your experiences, I can give some back. 10 years ago, reader interaction was different on literally all sites. Back...

In the first place, I said that because you did the same with authors, though...? At least I said "most", while you went with the literal "authors are", lol. And it's not like I care much, I had people call me that before, but I wouldn't know how that applies to the thread right now? Or to...

The thing is, that feeds into my paranoia even more. :blob_blank: Because I didn't mention anything below 2 Star because there is nothing. Even though they show up real fast as soon as my rating goes from 3,9~ to 4,0~ on average, there hasn't been a single one with 1 or 1,5 stars. I always get...

Well, I mean, there's nothing to ignore... if there's nothing to ignore, I guess. :blob_blank:

I wonder if it is.

Sounds crazy. And not to mention dickish. :blob_catflip:

But since the downvotes, it's not doing very good and it doesn't have many readers either. But still, wtf bro.

Oh man. :blob_blank: But an additional fact is that it started slowly with the simultaneous ratings of good and bad, but now it's so close to one another, my paranoia is kicking like crazy. Just KNOWING you are paranoid and it's in your head doesn't make it go away. Which makes everything more...

Exactly! I mean, it might be an ego thing with the 5 stars, because it mostly means they liked it and had nothing bad to say, but I would still love to know what they liked the most or what they thought of certain events or characters and choices. The 2 star is more important though, because at...

Yeah, wouldn't listen to that. Stand your ground. :blob_cookie:

The thing is, as I said, since I started getting bad ratings, they have always come in pairs. It started with one bad rating. Some time later came a 4 or 5 star rating, shortly after came another 2 or 2,5. And now it's literally together (or in the span of hours, so I don't see it over night)...