Commentary on rule #3172: It is much more achievable & sustainable to guarantee basic public housing than to modify the current system to be more fair. Although either is a massive improvement. Current end on rule commentary.
Commentary on rule #3171: Just because there are a rare few rare examples of people who refuse to work to survive, doesn’t mean basic housing shouldn’t be guaranteed. That is a false equivalence, cut such people out of your life and they will suffer enough on just the basics. With guaranteed housing such people will also be less of a drain on public recourses.
Commentary on rule #3170: Such people are either 5 years old, special needs, or made up. There is no reason not to guarantee housing, when the lack of housing makes employment near impossible and winter practically impossible to survive without assistance.
Commentary on rule #3169: A truly fair environment would guarantee basic housing for all who inhabit it. There should be no reason for a person to go without shelter, other than that person deciding not to. Lack of housing is inherently unfair.
Commentary on rule #3168: This rule mistakenly believes that allowing people to suffer indiscriminately creates strength. No it creates scars and wounds that few can recover from. Only a wounded and dying nation would let its citizens die to ensure the profits of the wealthy.
Commentary on rule #3167: There are two things to point out on this. 1. A strong nation would also guarantee basic housing for all citizens. 2. The time gained should be put back into improving the lives of the individuals and their communities.
My to favorite symphonies Dmitri Shostakovich’ s 4th symphony and Franz Liszt’s Faust symphony. I don’t know if I prefer one to the other. What are your thoughts about these two?
Whenever I try knapping rocks I only find quartzite. Quartzite is extremely hard to knap. Technically there is flint in the area, but I can’t find any bigger than a half dollar.