Personally, I'm not a fan of relying on archetypes or classifications for any of the characters, because I find doing so to be very limiting, almost to the point the it stifles creativity for the character, and the narrative. To that end, I'd advise against relying on archetypes for any characters.
Build the character first, to suit your vision and your narrative. The rest will follow. So, since there isn't any actual character here, I can't say one way or the other what I would think of them, as a character.
That said, utilizing the archetype as a base for said antagonist can certainly work. How well it works comes down to the execution and the narrative you're writing.
If you're going to use a character like that, some of the things you may want to consider are:
What is the character's role as an antagonist? (Are they a minor one, or a major one)
What is the story's narrative structure built around?
What are the story's narrative goals?
What is the story's genre?
What are the narrative themes in play?
As an example: A sci-fi story about space exploration and an eventual rebellion against an interstellar empire doesn't lend itself well to such an antagonist on the surface, especially if they are intended as a primary antagonist. However, the same story could also feature such an antagonist as a minor/supporting antagonist and work exceptionally well.
It all comes down to the execution and the interplay between the characters.
Ideally, that sort of antagonist would probably work best within a romance or love-triangle structure, especially if you want to insert psychological thriller and/or horror elements, but there is no reason that you can't utilize the archetype for any story or narrative structure.