Why are writers fighting the future AI?

Joined
Mar 8, 2026
Messages
44
Points
18
I'd rather read a shit story with no ai used than AI slop. simple as that
Fair enough but this is a preference, which is duly noted.
Care to elaborate why?
Hey, I think I haven't read a proper book that's completely written by AI, yet. Perhaps that's why I can't feel the exact level of frustration that others do.

Can anyone recommend me a book that is definitely written by AI? I wanna know how bad it is...
I haven't read a proper book that was completely written by AI, either. Can anyone point me towards one?

However, some authors did freely admit to using AI during the writing process and were not ashamed of it, e.g. Margaret Atwood, Salman Rushdie, Neil Gaiman, Brandon Sanderson, Ian McEwan, Joyce Carol Oates, Tead Chiang. These are the most famous (? successful) ones.
This is out there on the public domain.

Buy any book off the shelf published nowadays from a contemporary author, AI will be present at one stage or another admitted or not.

I think the debate is not about AI completely writing books, the debate is about AI is being used as an aid.

Some commenters, however, do not want to see or acknowledge the difference.
 
Last edited:

Dragonpig

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2025
Messages
38
Points
18
I would like to thank all you writers for your opinions and thoughts and feelings. I learned a lot. Also I learned something else I need to start reading more of your stuff because that's can help me improve my writing again, thank you.
 

Arakun10809

New member
Joined
Feb 23, 2026
Messages
13
Points
3
AI is useful for pointing out grammatical mistakes and plot consistency errors (NotebookLM has been quite useful for that and prevented logical errors within my works). However, anything other than that, I absolutely abhor. Having an AI do something for you (i.e. writing your story, creating story outlines for you) is abominable and a fundamental affront to the literary craft. It lacks the human soul and heart that is put into a work, and it can really show with dialogue that feels like it was pulled straight from Reddit. Even with what I said about me using AI for grammatical and plot consistency fixes, I take them as suggestions, not something to override what I wrote. Also, having an AI say "If you want, I can do X for you..." is really annoying and shows a lack of sincerity and awareness as to what you uploaded to it to analyze for editing. Tech companies need to stop doing that.
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2026
Messages
44
Points
18
AI is useful for pointing out grammatical mistakes and plot consistency errors (NotebookLM has been quite useful for that and prevented logical errors within my works). However, anything other than that, I absolutely abhor. Having an AI do something for you (i.e. writing your story, creating story outlines for you) is abominable and a fundamental affront to the literary craft. It lacks the human soul and heart that is put into a work, and it can really show with dialogue that feels like it was pulled straight from Reddit. Even with what I said about me using AI for grammatical and plot consistency fixes, I take them as suggestions, not something to override what I wrote. Also, having an AI say "If you want, I can do X for you..." is really annoying and shows a lack of sincerity and awareness as to what you uploaded to it to analyze for editing. Tech companies need to stop doing that.
I applaud your balanced view on this.
 

FRWriter

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2024
Messages
554
Points
108
These discussions pop up daily now. I always hear, "Why? Just why?"

Show me one AI-generated/modified story on SH that's successful. If you can't, just accept that AI stories are not something people enjoy.
 

Makimaam

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 17, 2025
Messages
147
Points
63
Hey, I think I haven't read a proper book that's completely written by AI, yet. Perhaps that's why I can't feel the exact level of frustration that others do.

Can anyone recommend me a book that is definitely written by AI? I wanna know how bad it is...
Random picks (skimmed only)
Amateur prompter: https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/1...write/chapter/2818151/chapter-1-a-second-shot

Experienced prompter:
These discussions pop up daily now. I always hear, "Why? Just why?"

Show me one AI-generated/modified story on SH that's successful. If you can't, just accept that AI stories are not something people enjoy.

There are quite a few. But unless the authors tag them as such, I wouldn’t call them out here.
 
Last edited:

Avarice_Of_The_Seven

Fallen Angel Of Rebellion
Joined
Nov 24, 2025
Messages
177
Points
63
Random picks (skimmed only)
Amateur prompter: https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/1...write/chapter/2818151/chapter-1-a-second-shot

Experienced prompter:


There are quite a few. But unless the authors tag them as such, I wouldn’t call them out here.
The first one was... I have no words... It was so bad that I felt even AI wouldn't write in such a way.


The second one though, it's formatting was messed up which made the experience worse but yeah, I think I somewhat understand now...
 

ElijahRyne

A Hermit that’s NOT that Lazy, currentlycomplainen
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Messages
1,823
Points
153
I've been noticing a recurring debate among writers: pro-AI vs. anti-AI. But here's my take.

Think about what happened when photography was introduced. Anyone could pick up a camera, but that didn't kill painting. It actually did two things: it made visual capture more efficient and accessible, AND it pushed painters to become true specialists. The best painters didn't disappear. They became more intentional, more skilled, more valued.

I think AI is doing the same thing to writing. Those who choose not to use it are going to rise to the top as the best of the best, pure craftspeople. Those who do use AI tools are going to become highly efficient and still produce great work. Either way.
LLM’s are a tool. One that absolutely sucks at creative writing. After reading a page, it doesn’t take a genius to tell what was written by a human, what was written by an AI, and what was enhanced by one. The only times an AI work, enhanced or fully LLM, is better than human work is when comparing it to humans who are too lazy to use a grammar checker. Even someone with a partial understanding of English writes more interesting than any AI I have seen so far.

There is a reason why AI writing is called slop. At the base layer is a neural net that predicts the next letter/token, making it an advanced form of predictive text. Then above that is a layer that checks the lower level and sees if its response fits the prompt. Then there are various layers to make the writing more interesting, accurate, etcetera. However at the fundamental level it is just predictive text guessing at what the most likely next letter, word, etc. will be after being trained on an extremely large selection of text. It is an average word generator, or more accurately an average word generator targeted at the prompt, and with grammar and context recognition.
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2026
Messages
44
Points
18
Random picks (skimmed only)
Amateur prompter: https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/1...write/chapter/2818151/chapter-1-a-second-shot

Experienced prompter:


There are quite a few. But unless the authors tag them as such, I wouldn’t call them out here.

LLM’s are a tool. One that absolutely sucks at creative writing. After reading a page, it doesn’t take a genius to tell what was written by a human, what was written by an AI, and what was enhanced by one. The only times an AI work, enhanced or fully LLM, is better than human work is when comparing it to humans who are too lazy to use a grammar checker. Even someone with a partial understanding of English writes more interesting than any AI I have seen so far.

There is a reason why AI writing is called slop. At the base layer is a neural net that predicts the next letter/token, making it an advanced form of predictive text. Then above that is a layer that checks the lower level and sees if its response fits the prompt. Then there are various layers to make the writing more interesting, accurate, etcetera. However at the fundamental level it is just predictive text guessing at what the most likely next letter, word, etc. will be after being trained on an extremely large selection of text. It is an average word generator, or more accurately an average word generator targeted at the prompt, and with grammar and context recognition.
Thanks for this. I like the way the argument is presented.
 
Top