My Love For The English Language (Best Language In The World)

LuoirM

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2021
Messages
1,445
Points
153
1746461178758.png
1746461183268.png
1746461188595.png
1746461196124.png
1746461199762.png
1746461203556.png
1746461230462.png
 

AnonUnlimited

????????? (???/???)
Joined
Apr 18, 2022
Messages
4,574
Points
183
Modern English is multiple words from many languages using a specific grammar.
 

Tyranomaster

Guy who writes stuff
Joined
Oct 5, 2022
Messages
746
Points
133
1746462503217.jpeg

Cope and seethe, less information dense languages. All these other languages have to literally talk faster in order to convey as much information per syllable as english (and many literally do).



Added note: - Other languages are like, "English is just borrowing from all these other languages". I prefer the interpretation that we had a marketplace of languages, and the free market of ideas allowed the best words and grammar rules to survive, leading to our superiority.
 

LuoirM

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2021
Messages
1,445
Points
153
View attachment 38508
Cope and seethe, less information dense languages. All these other languages have to literally talk faster in order to convey as much information per syllable as english (and many literally do).

How dare you bring up statistic and differing points from the poster? I'm warning you, young/medifum/old man.
 

Tegeli

Active member
Joined
Oct 17, 2024
Messages
30
Points
33
The premier element of English is the plethora of recondite sesquipedalian words that are in truth perfectly cromulent compounds loaned from the more sensible foreign vernacular.
 

dukerino

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2024
Messages
56
Points
48
I love English because all the different languages that fell face-first into its melting pot give us different layers of meaning and expressivity--from Latin and Ancient Greek we can infuse our sentences with the stultifying air of the philosophical assemblies. From the Romantic languages we're lent the mellifluous poetry and sumptuous, hedonic purple prose. And then there's this fun underclass gutter of choppy, satisfying Germanic rooted stuff like "fuck." It's a mongrel language in the best way.
 

Assurbanipal_II

Nyampress of the Four Corners of the World
Joined
Jul 27, 2019
Messages
2,749
Points
153
View attachment 38508
Cope and seethe, less information dense languages. All these other languages have to literally talk faster in order to convey as much information per syllable as english (and many literally do).



Added note: - Other languages are like, "English is just borrowing from all these other languages". I prefer the interpretation that we had a marketplace of languages, and the free market of ideas allowed the best words and grammar rules to survive, leading to our superiority.
:blob_neutral: This study seems highly dubious. I am not sure how English can beat proper compound words.
 

Fairemont

No Bullying Allowed
Joined
Apr 15, 2025
Messages
606
Points
93

Representing_Tromba

Sleep deprived mess of an author begging for feedb
Joined
Jan 29, 2020
Messages
5,988
Points
233
As a native English speaker, I thank you for your love of our language, but humbly request you choose a different(better) one as your favorite... like Navajo.
 

Tyranomaster

Guy who writes stuff
Joined
Oct 5, 2022
Messages
746
Points
133
:blob_neutral: This study seems highly dubious. I am not sure how English can beat proper compound words.
A compound word is going to have more syllables than a single english word that describes the same thing.

For example: Streichholzschachtel -> Matchbox

Strike-wood-box. 4 syllables -> 2 syllables

English has a lot of words like this that other languages prefer compound descriptive words for.

This isn't necessarily a bad thing, since obviously in german, the word is also acts as instructions for the object in this case. However, it also makes the information density per syllable less, as they both communicate the object concept. It is easier to learn the german version, since a learner would likely already know the simpler base words (strike, wood, box) as well. In English, you'd know box, but Match would require context (i.e. having seen the matches in a matchbox, not to be confused with a match as in a game). English requires a lot of conceptual understand and context interpretation, which both lead to it conveying ideas in a more dense manner per syllable, but also making it more complex and harder to hop in to the middle of a random conversation.
 

Assurbanipal_II

Nyampress of the Four Corners of the World
Joined
Jul 27, 2019
Messages
2,749
Points
153
A compound word is going to have more syllables than a single english word that describes the same thing.

For example: Streichholzschachtel -> Matchbox

Strike-wood-box. 4 syllables -> 2 syllables

English has a lot of words like this that other languages prefer compound descriptive words for.

This isn't necessarily a bad thing, since obviously in german, the word is also acts as instructions for the object in this case. However, it also makes the information density per syllable less, as they both communicate the object concept. It is easier to learn the german version, since a learner would likely already know the simpler base words (strike, wood, box) as well. In English, you'd know box, but Match would require context (i.e. having seen the matches in a matchbox, not to be confused with a match as in a game). English requires a lot of conceptual understand and context interpretation, which both lead to it conveying ideas in a more dense manner per syllable, but also making it more complex and harder to hop in to the middle of a random conversation.
Waldkampf?
 

Tyranomaster

Guy who writes stuff
Joined
Oct 5, 2022
Messages
746
Points
133
Waldkampf?
Yes. There are examples in every language that go either direction. The density difference is like 5-10% or something. On the average though, English is more dense. For every forest combat, there is an ice skating. On the balance, as demonstrated by the study, English is slightly more dense (concept to concept, syllable to syllable).

And for a handful of them, where an English phrase WOULD be longer, like schadenfreude, we just use the german itself. (A lot of english is germanic origin ~25%)
 

Assurbanipal_II

Nyampress of the Four Corners of the World
Joined
Jul 27, 2019
Messages
2,749
Points
153
Yes. There are examples in every language that go either direction. The density difference is like 5-10% or something. On the average though, English is more dense. For every forest combat, there is an ice skating. On the balance, as demonstrated by the study, English is slightly more dense (concept to concept, syllable to syllable).

And for a handful of them, where an English phrase WOULD be longer, like schadenfreude, we just use the german itself. (A lot of english is germanic origin ~25%)
:blob_neutral: The reality of the study is very much doubted. It is an opinion. And not a particular good one.

In fact, your first example as your entire argument hinges on a peculiar definition of the concept of "information". A premise is not exactly information.
 

Tyranomaster

Guy who writes stuff
Joined
Oct 5, 2022
Messages
746
Points
133
:blob_neutral: The reality of the study is very much doubted. It is an opinion. And not a particular good one.

In fact, your first example as your entire argument hinges on a peculiar definition of the concept of "information". A premise is not exactly information.
Sounds like coping and seething to me.
 
Top