I suppose it depends on the application of the Isekai genre. This particular term is most closely associated with the Japanese WN/LN market, so you get audience looking for that specific overused formula. But Isekai has an equivalent in the Western market too, the portal fantasy. Technically, they are nearly the same thing, but people have different expectations for them.here's what I noticed...
its a fairly rigid genre system. you can say it doesn't have "rules" you sort of must follow, but... it kinda does. Now, the language that gets used can be very soft. "see, you need to understand. readers expect certain story beats, and you have to give them these things." I've also heard it said. "Isekai, is a contract. a promise. you say isekai, the reader better get the things he expects to see."
So... I don't know what it is I'm trying to say, but you can do a lot within the genre and be popular, you "just" have to find the right audience, I suppose.
So you're saying the genre is stiffled by authors who are gatekeeping it, or who are afraid of not getting audience? You know... that makes sense. It's the same reason why there are so few actually original movies, and so many reboots, sequels, prequels, alternate universes... of the popular ones, especially the superhero genre reusing the same formula and characters ad nauseam. Bonus points for making it politically correct.now that's just what seems to be the rules of the isekai genre game.
on top of that, we have to add the ever present "rules" of web-novel-ing in general.
and what do you end up with, by the time you're done.
the same situation as the old time harlequin romances.
fans typically reward the books that do what they're "supposed to do" for the genre.
critics? say they keep trying to read the genre, but its the same story every time, over and over again.
Me, I find soap operas... to be repetitive and boring.
fans though... they get withdrawal symptoms if they miss a single minute of "their soap".
Reminds me of a series I read where the "star investigator" only believed to be a star investigator, but was actually fairly incompetent and chronically unable to listen to orders, always winning by chance, and always playing the victim when promotion passed her by. I don't remember much of the books, but in one of them, I think she would have never discovered the killer, if the killer did not reveal themselves by kidnapping her first and spilling everything.----------------------------
it is. it sounds exciting.
Just seeing that first sentence on one of my old paperbacks back covers?
Yeah, I'd have read that one next.
but me, if i next read 2 or 3 more, and it started to seem like the same exact formula... i'd quit grabbing for it.
this happened to me with the "serial killer investigation" novels. I got burned out on the tropes.
it got to where I could check stuff off a list as I read one.
when's the big autopsy scene, with weird info that will be later useful? oh here we go. called it.
i wonder which boss will be incompetent, preventing the star investigator from getting the job done? Oh, there they are.
hey, will it be a stripper or a hooker, that conveniently knows the critical information. there she is!
where's the dead witness, i wonder where they will hide the body at this time... oh, freezer again? ha.
then, the big one on one fight, detective against the evil crazy killer, cornered.
dude, why even carry a gun? you know it goes hand to hand, and you almost lose ten times, until you JUST squeak out a win.
*happens*
I got bored.