Writing How to write a description of things in motions like chain reactions for a story?

LilTV1155

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2021
Messages
909
Points
133
To all writers of science fiction, nerds, geeks, hobby scientists, and etc,

The things that occurs in the story are not humanoid characters, but happened to be the smallest units of all matters. The story describe how those units transform into a living being through a long chain reaction. It's easy to summarize it.

But it's hard to show your readers that those particles keep flying everywhere and bumping into everything before attaching to anything. Do I need to throw in poetic descriptions or how should make the process look or feel epic to the readers, who may not be into science stuffs?

Thank you,
LilTV1155
 

RepresentingCaution

Level 37 ? ? Pronouns: she/whore ♀
Joined
Apr 15, 2020
Messages
9,798
Points
233
Were you doing the lab report thing? I suggest some illustrations. Lab reports often come with drawings. They don't have to be good drawings as long as it's clear enough.
 

LilTV1155

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2021
Messages
909
Points
133
Were you doing the lab report thing? I suggest some illustrations. Lab reports often come with drawings. They don't have to be good drawings as long as it's clear enough.
Still working on it. The writing format keep mutating like a virus in many way even though the ideal format is still consistent.

I also included some drawings in it. But, I am not good with drawing things that are in motions. I kind of . . . . feel like I lost my narrative voice in that lab report writing.
 

RepresentingCaution

Level 37 ? ? Pronouns: she/whore ♀
Joined
Apr 15, 2020
Messages
9,798
Points
233
Still working on it. The writing format keep mutating like a virus in many way even though the ideal format is still consistent.

I also included some drawings in it. But, I am not good with drawing things that are in motions. I kind of . . . . feel like I lost my narrative voice in that lab report writing.
 

LostLibrarian

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2019
Messages
709
Points
133
There was an interesting podcast episode I listened to a few weeks ago about how puppetry and writing share a lot of ideas and how some concepts of ideas of puppetry can used in writing. The core idea was that a puppet on stage has a really limited range of motions it can do (no facial expressions, rough body language, etc) and that one has to waste no space and give a lot of meaning to every thing that happens while not moving without meaning.

Writing the stuff like a scientist report would bore a lot of readers who aren't into that. Even just listing every single step can be way too much for a reader, because at some point they stop to care. Most people read webnovels to get entertained and not to read a detailed scientific report (real or fictional). So I would recommend to use concepts from both writing battle scenes (set the scene, then focus on the shifts in action) and the ideas mentioned above to describe it.

In short:
- The description of bouncing particles are only fun for a handful of times no matter the speech you use. There aren't that many different descriptions and it even gets silly if you repeat yourself with grander and grander words each time.
- So instead, don't waste those few times on unnecessary steps but on the "cool" ones. Start describing the particles on their own. For that, use interesting comparisons (a lot of fiction uses either bubbles in liquid or (moving) stars in space). One wonderful example (although reversed) is still this:
- After the status quo is established, concentrate on the times something changes. The first time particles group together. Afterwards, skip "and more came". "And a different type of particles came". "And then XY". Most readers don't care what cool real or fictional elements you can list. Even if they read through it, it'll become "meaningless motion" that
- When you concentrate on the important steps don't describe them on their own, but give those small movements a deeper meaning. "This is the first step on a long journey.", "This is the blueprint for a somatic cell.", "This is the first brain cell. It'll multiply and multiply until the being can think.", "This cell already contracting on its own. It'll later form a complex that pumps the blood through the body.", ...
For that two more examples from media:
Look at the background of the big bang theory and how they only pick some (not even all) of the most known events to display human history in 30 seconds:
Or a bit more scientific the way from egg cell to foetus: https://blog.pregistry.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/AdobeStock_52637629.jpg
- On that note, make sure to use moments that are already understood by readers or those you can describe through easy comparisons. Don't explain your world's rules of gravity and evolution if not needed. Explain the most important steps with the least amount of needed extra information.
- Don't repeat the "same step but a little bit different". Nobody cares. Great fight scenes in writing aren't "And he swang his sword. Again. And Again. And a swing from the left. And a swing from the right. And a swing from the top. And another swing. And there was another swing." It's "their exchange continued for 3 minutes without anyone getting ahead, until finally [status quo] changes". And the status quo change isn't "he took a step to the left" but something that shifts the scene and matters. Detailed but endless fight scenes are often skipped by readers because "nothing important happens". (It's really obvious when something important happens in the middle of a fight (new character appears) and three chapters later everyone goes "Wait? Who is that person?")

So the way I would go:
Concentrate on the important moments, make it really visual ("and epic") for readers who don't like science, cut out all unneeded explanation (except you write for a core audience of hard sci-fi and the like), cut out scientific infodumps, and give every step a meaning that shows the reader that the tension builds and builds (particle -> ... --> cell --> cool cell --> mini living thing --> bigger living thing --> end).
 

greyblob

"Staff Memeber" pleasr
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Messages
2,749
Points
153
To all writers of science fiction, nerds, geeks, hobby scientists, and etc,

The things that occurs in the story are not humanoid characters, but happened to be the smallest units of all matters. The story describe how those units transform into a living being through a long chain reaction. It's easy to summarize it.

But it's hard to show your readers that those particles keep flying everywhere and bumping into everything before attaching to anything. Do I need to throw in poetic descriptions or how should make the process look or feel epic to the readers, who may not be into science stuffs?

Thank you,
LilTV1155
how about describing it from the inside? imagine yourself standing and the cells around you are rubber balls, flying and bouncing off each other. you could even go third person of a single cell and slowly follow along as it merges into more complex structures. untill it finally becomes whole and a conscious is formed
 

Zirrboy

Fueled by anger
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
1,193
Points
153
Especially the "Before the dawn of man" narrative bits seem of for a supposed report.

And the aggressive watermark placement, though that is primarily preference.
 

LilTV1155

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2021
Messages
909
Points
133
looks pretty good. i appreciate the effort you put, but it doesn't look like a lab report I'm familiar with. those have a rather strict format.
Can you please give me a reference regarding the strict format?
Especially the "Before the dawn of man" narrative bits seem of for a supposed report.

And the aggressive watermark placement, though that is primarily preference.
Yeah, there are actually two narrative voices in the story - the Narrator and the Reporter.
The narrating characters are not present throughout the story, because it's a recording and a report. So something like a documentary.
After I complete Part 1 and Part 2, I will find a way to separate the two out as soon as possible.
Hopefully.
-
The watermark placement is personally designed as a warning, territorial marking, and self-appeasement for my dumb paranoia, which wents nuts after hearing pirate dramas elsewhere.
 

greyblob

"Staff Memeber" pleasr
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Messages
2,749
Points
153
Can you please give me a reference regarding the strict format?
they usually follow something like this:
  • abstract (if necessary)
  • introduction
  • aims and goals (doesn't really fit here)
  • instruments used (describe the device/s used)
  • procedure/findings
  • discussion
  • conclusion
it varies for different fields and experiments, but they're similar for the most part. just google "lab report templates" or "lab report formula" and check the images. you don't have to follow it to the teeth, just get an idea of how it looks. maybe even look up random experiments to see how they're written.
 

LilTV1155

Well-known member
Joined
May 8, 2021
Messages
909
Points
133
What's the smallest unit of energy, by the way? Like at atomic level.
 

LostLibrarian

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2019
Messages
709
Points
133
how is this chapter for a lab report?
What do you want to achieve? Something fun to read or something that sounds more like a lab report?
After my first look at it, I would probably try to use "a scientist's diary" rather than a lab report.
 

LostLibrarian

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2019
Messages
709
Points
133
Although it has to be said, that electron volt is only the usualy used notation.
The actual "smallest unit" (unit as in "size") is many, many times smaller than electron volt.
 
Top